- The department shall enter into an agreement for each public-private initiative.
- The department shall include terms and conditions in the agreement that it determines are appropriate in the public interest and to protect highway and traffic safety.
- The agreement may provide that:
- The private entity may pledge the transportation system project or the right-of-way involved in the transportation system project if the project or right-of-way is entirely funded by private moneys and the department determines that such a pledge is in the public interest. The private entity shall not pledge or cause a lien to be created on a transportation system project or a right-of-way involved in a transportation system project if public funds were used to purchase the project or right-of-way or the department owns the project or right-of-way.
- The private entity owns the highway and right-of-way involved in the transportation system project if the project or right-of-way is entirely funded by private moneys and the department determines that such ownership is in the public interest. The department may not transfer ownership of a transportation system project or a right-of-way involved in a transportation system project if public funds were used to purchase the project or right-of-way or the department owns the project or right-of-way.
- Notwithstanding the fact that the department enters into an agreement for a public-private initiative, the department is not a partner or a joint venturer with the private entity for any purpose.
- The department shall not enter into any exclusive arrangement, lease, or other agreement for use of the public rights-of-way by a telecommunications provider that in any way discriminates or prevents a similar arrangement being made with any other telecommunications provider. All leases of rights-of-way to telecommunications providers must be done on a nondiscriminatory same-term basis. If a telecommunications provider compensates the state in other than cash, a cash equivalent value must be imputed and attached to the agreement, and any other telecommunications provider may have equal access to the right-of-way for the cash equivalent. The cash equivalent shall be an estimate of the fair market value of the service or product provided to the state, and a telecommunications provider may ask a court of competent jurisdiction to review the imputed monetary amount which the court may lower to the reasonable fair market value if necessary.
Source: L. 95: Entire part added, p. 259, § 2, effective April 17. L. 98: (3) amended, p. 447, § 12, effective August 5.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 1998 act amending subsection (3), see section 1 of chapter 154, Session Laws of Colorado 1998.