49-287.01. Investigation scoring and site registry; no further action
A. When information of a possible release or threatened release of a hazardous substance is received, the director may conduct a preliminary investigation to obtain additional information necessary to determine the potential risk to the public health or welfare or the environment in order to score the site or portion of the site and include it on the site registry. By written agreement, the director may allow any person to conduct any portion of the preliminary investigation.
B. After completing the preliminary investigation or at any time during the preliminary investigation, the director may suspend or terminate an investigation or determine that no further investigation or action is necessary. The director may reopen the preliminary investigation on a determination that the release or threatened release continues to present an imminent and substantial threat to the public health or welfare or the environment. If a preliminary investigation is completed, the director shall prepare a draft of the site registry report required under subsection D of this section. If the director drafts a site registry report pursuant to this section, the report shall contain a description of the site or portion of the site, including its geographical boundaries, and a score in accordance with the site scoring method established in rules adopted by the director.
C. Before finalizing the report and the score, the director shall furnish a copy to the current owners and operators of the site or portion of the site, if known, and shall provide fifteen days for review and comment. The director shall then place a copy in the public file and shall publish the score in a newspaper of general circulation within the county in which the site is located. The director shall provide thirty days for comment and shall consider any comments before issuing the final report and score.
D. The director shall maintain a registry of scored sites or portions of sites that includes a brief description of the site or portion of the site, its score and a brief description of the status of investigative and remedial actions. The scoring of a site or portion of the site, its relative score or its placement on the registry does not necessarily represent a determination that the release of a hazardous substance from the site poses a threat to human health or welfare or the environment. Prior to approving any remedy that may result in water quality exceeding water quality standards after completion of the remedy, the director shall place a notice in the registry established pursuant to this subsection that the remedy may result in water quality exceeding water quality standards.
E. New scores shall be added to the registry as soon as practicable. The registry shall be published annually by the secretary of state in the Arizona administrative register. The department shall also publish notice of the availability of the registry in a newspaper of general statewide circulation.
F. Any person may request that the director make a determination that a site or portion of a site requires no further action or should be rescored. The request shall include information, including the specific hazardous substances released at or from the site or portion of the site, and a geographical description of the site or portion of the site sufficient for a determination by the director regarding the requested action. The director may request additional information from the requesting party within ninety days after receiving the party’s request, and the director shall provide the reasons for requesting the additional information. The person making the request shall submit the additional information within sixty days after receiving the director’s request for additional information. Within thirty days of receipt of the additional information, the director shall notify the requesting party if the additional information is complete. The submission of incomplete information may result in a denial of the no further action request. The parties may agree in writing to additional time for responses. In addition to requesting information, the director or the director’s authorized representative may conduct an investigation of the site or portion of the site and shall be given access to the portion of the site under the control of the requestor. The director or the director’s authorized representative shall be allowed access to the site as a requirement for making a no further action request. The director shall deny a request for a no further action determination if access to the site is not provided. A request pursuant to this subsection may only be made once per calendar year. After determining that the information submitted is sufficient for action on the request, the director shall publish notice of the request for rescoring or determination of no further action on a site or portion of the site and shall provide thirty days for public comment. Based on the information and comments received, and within sixty days after the close of the public comment period, unless extended by the director for good cause, the director shall determine whether the score should be changed or a determination of no further action should be made and shall give notice of that decision to the person who made the request and any persons who provided comment. The director shall make a final decision on a no further action or rescoring request within three hundred days after receiving the request unless the time is extended in writing by the parties. The director’s decision shall contain the factual, technical and legal grounds for the decision. Any changes to a score or determinations of no further action shall be published in the registry.
G. A determination of no further action shall be made if the director finds that the site or portion of the site does not present a significant risk to the public health or welfare or the environment. The director’s determination on a no further action request shall be based on the rules adopted by the department pursuant to section 49-282.06. A determination of no further action shall state whether it is for soils or the groundwater, or both. A determination of no further action regarding a site or a portion of the site means that the department shall not proceed with or require further remedial action under this article for the specific hazardous substances within the geographical area covered by the determination, provided that the determination of no further action does not preclude the director from obtaining access to the area covered by the determination under this article or any other law. The department may reopen an investigation and take or require remedial action for any of the following reasons:
1. On discovery of new information that, based on the rules adopted by the department pursuant to section 49-282.06, would result in the potential denial of a no further action request.
2. That information submitted to the director pursuant to subsection F of this section was inaccurate, misleading or incomplete.
3. The reopening of an investigation or the taking of a remedial action is necessary to respond to a release or the threat of a release of a hazardous substance that may present an imminent and substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment.
H. The director’s decision under subsection F of this section may be appealed pursuant to section 49-298, subsection B by the person who made the request or any party who will be adversely affected by the action and who submitted comments. A person who has previously filed an administrative appeal under this subsection or any provision of law in effect on or after April 29, 1997 concerning previous investigations by the director that resulted in the director’s decision being upheld bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the director’s action that is being appealed was unsupported by the evidence in any further administrative appeals involving the same site or portion of the site and shall pay the director’s cost of reviewing the request and the director’s attorney fees and costs incurred in the appeal if the director’s decision is upheld.
I. If the director determines that remediation of a site or a portion of a site will be addressed pursuant to a provision of this title other than this article, the director may suspend any further investigation or action under this article. If the site or portion of a site is listed on the registry, the suspension shall be reflected on the registry.
J. If a site has been placed on the registry and the director determines that remediation of a site or a portion of a site will be addressed pursuant to a provision of this title other than this article, the director may remove the site from the registry.
K. If the director determines that a site on the registry does not require further remedial action under this article, the director may remove the site from the registry.
L. The director shall maintain a list of sites removed from the registry. This list shall be available to the public.
M. A site that has been removed from the registry may be reopened and remedial action taken or required for any of the following reasons:
1. On discovery of new information that, based on the rules adopted by the department pursuant to section 49-282.06, would result in the potential denial of a no further action request.
2. Information submitted to the director pursuant to this section is inaccurate, misleading or incomplete.
3. The reopening of an investigation or the taking of a remedial action is necessary to respond to a release or the threatened release of a hazardous substance that may present an imminent and substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment.