(a) Both state and local agencies that implement criminal justice practices resulting in outcomes that reduce commitments to the Division of Correction should be rewarded. (b) If a state agency, county, or judicial district has implemented proven risk-reduction strategies that reduce the number of offenders returning to the Division of Correction with no resultant increase […]
(a) Costs averted due to a reduction in commitments to the Division of Correction or a reduction in the period of time served in the Division of Correction, to the extent possible, shall be reinvested into those state agencies, counties, or judicial districts as an incentive to further the crime and recidivism reduction strategies being […]
(a) (1) The Division of Community Correction shall receive additional funding for committing to a reduction in the number of probation revocations that result from a technical violation or a new crime. (2) The baseline for comparing probation revocation data shall be based on the number of probation revocations and expected length of stay. (3) […]
The Board of Corrections shall: (1) Establish rules for counties, multicounty partnerships, or judicial districts to apply for funds under this subchapter; (2) Calculate and determine the baseline for the Division of Community Correction’s revocation rate and for the Division of Correction’s commitments’ length of stay for evaluation purposes; and (3) Calculate the averted costs […]
(a) (1) The Division of Community Correction shall provide data and information as requested by the Board of Corrections. (2) That data and information shall include without limitation: (A) The total number of probationers from each of the Division of Community Correction’s individual probation or parole areas for the current year and previous years, as […]
