§ 41-29-517. Recording of intercepted communications; sealing, custody, and destruction of recordings
The contents of a wire, oral or other communication intercepted by means authorized by this article shall be recorded on tape, wire or other comparable device. The recording of the contents of a wire, oral or other communication under this subsection shall be done in a way that protects the recording from editing or other […]
§ 41-29-519. Sealing, custody, and destruction of applications and orders
The judge shall seal each application made and order granted under this article. Custody of the applications and orders shall be wherever the judge directs. An application or order may be disclosed only upon a showing of good cause before a judge of competent jurisdiction, and may not be destroyed until at least ten (10) […]
§ 41-29-521. Penalty for violating Section 41-29-517 or 41-29-519
A violation of Section 41-29-517 or 41-29-519 shall be punished as contempt of court.
§ 41-29-523. Notice to persons named in order or application; inspection of intercepted communications; postponement of notice
Within a reasonable time but not later than ninety (90) days after the date an application for an order is denied or after the date an order or the last extension, if any, expires, the judge who granted or denied the application shall cause to be served upon the persons named in the order or […]
§ 41-29-525. Parties to be furnished copy of court order and application prior to trial or proceeding; suppression of intercepted communications
The contents of an intercepted wire, oral or other communication or evidence derived from the communication may not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in a trial, hearing or other proceeding in a federal or state court unless each party has been furnished with a copy of the court order and application under which […]
§ 41-29-501. Definitions
As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them herein unless the context requires otherwise: “Aggrieved person” means a person who was a party to an intercepted wire, oral or other communication or a person against whom the interception was directed. “Communication common carrier” has the meaning given the […]
§ 41-29-503. Admissibility of evidence obtained in violation of this article
The contents of an intercepted wire, oral or other communication and evidence derived from an intercepted wire, oral or other communication may not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States […]
§ 41-29-505. Judicial order authorizing interception of communications
A judge of competent jurisdiction in the circuit court district of the location where the interception of wire, oral or other communications is sought, or a circuit court district contiguous to such circuit court district, may issue an order authorizing interception of wire, oral or other communications only if the prosecutor applying for the order […]
§ 41-29-507. Bureau of Narcotics only agency authorized to possess, operate, etc. monitoring devices; exceptions
No person, agency of the state or political subdivision of the state, other than the Bureau of Narcotics, is authorized by this article to own, possess, install, operate or monitor an electronic, mechanical or other device. The Bureau of Narcotics may be assisted by an investigative or law enforcement officer in the operation and monitoring […]