171.207 – Transfer of powers.
171.207 Transfer of powers.—This part is an alternative provision otherwise provided by law, as authorized in s. 4, Art. VIII of the State Constitution, for any transfer of power resulting from an interlocal service boundary agreement for the provision of services or the acquisition of public facilities entered into by a county, municipality, independent special district, […]
171.208 – Municipal extraterritorial power.
171.208 Municipal extraterritorial power.—This part authorizes a municipality to exercise extraterritorial powers that include, but are not limited to, the authority to provide services and facilities within the unincorporated area or within the territory of another municipality as provided within an interlocal service boundary agreement. These powers are in addition to other municipal powers that otherwise […]
171.209 – County incorporated area power.
171.209 County incorporated area power.—As provided in an interlocal service boundary agreement, this part authorizes a county to exercise powers within a municipality that include, but are not limited to, the authority to provide services and facilities within the territory of a municipality. These powers are in addition to other county powers that otherwise exist. History.—s. […]
171.21 – Effect of part on interlocal agreement and county charter.
171.21 Effect of part on interlocal agreement and county charter.—A joint planning agreement, a charter provision adopted under s. 171.044(4), or any other interlocal agreement between local governments including a county, municipality, or independent special district is not affected by this part; however, a county, municipality or independent special district may avail itself of this part, […]
171.211 – Interlocal service boundary agreement presumed valid and binding.
171.211 Interlocal service boundary agreement presumed valid and binding.— (1) If there is litigation over the terms, conditions, construction, or enforcement of an interlocal service boundary agreement, the agreement shall be presumed valid, and the challenger has the burden of proving its invalidity. (2) Notwithstanding part I, it is the intent of this part to authorize a municipality […]
171.212 – Disputes regarding construction and effect of an interlocal service boundary agreement.
171.212 Disputes regarding construction and effect of an interlocal service boundary agreement.—If there is a question or dispute about the construction or effect of an interlocal service boundary agreement, a local government shall initiate and proceed through the conflict resolution procedures established in chapter 164. If there is a failure to resolve the conflict, no later […]
171.045 – Annexation limited to a single county.
171.045 Annexation limited to a single county.—In order for an annexation proceeding to be valid for the purposes of this chapter, the annexation must take place within the boundaries of a single county. History.—s. 2, ch. 74-190.
171.205 – Consent requirements for annexation of land under this part.
171.205 Consent requirements for annexation of land under this part.—Notwithstanding part I, an interlocal service boundary agreement may provide a process for annexation consistent with this section or with part I. (1) For all or a portion of the area within a designated municipal service area, the interlocal service boundary agreement may provide a flexible process for […]
171.046 – Annexation of enclaves.
171.046 Annexation of enclaves.— (1) The Legislature recognizes that enclaves can create significant problems in planning, growth management, and service delivery, and therefore declares that it is the policy of the state to eliminate enclaves. (2) In order to expedite the annexation of enclaves of 110 acres or less into the most appropriate incorporated jurisdiction, based upon existing […]
171.206 – Effect of interlocal service boundary area agreement on annexations.
171.206 Effect of interlocal service boundary area agreement on annexations.— (1) An interlocal service boundary agreement is binding on the parties to the agreement, and a party may not take any action that violates the interlocal service boundary agreement. (2) Notwithstanding part I, without consent of the county and the affected municipality by resolution, a county or an […]