US Lawyer Database

For Lawyer-Seekers

YOU DESERVE THE BEST LAWYER

Section 3-2001 – Definitions

    (a)    In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated.     (b)    “Collaborative law communication” means a statement, whether oral or in a record or verbal or nonverbal, that:         (1)    Is made to conduct, participate in, continue, or reconvene a collaborative law process; and         (2)    Occurs after the parties sign a collaborative law participation agreement and before the collaborative […]

Section 3-2002 – Collaborative Law Participation Agreement; Requirements

    (a)    A collaborative law participation agreement shall:         (1)    Be in a record;         (2)    Be signed by the parties;         (3)    State the parties’ intention to resolve a collaborative matter through a collaborative law process under this subtitle;         (4)    Describe the nature and scope of the matter;         (5)    Identify the collaborative lawyer who represents each party in the process; and         (6)    Contain a statement […]

Section 3-2003 – Beginning and Concluding a Collaborative Law Process

    (a)    A collaborative law process begins when the parties sign a collaborative law participation agreement.     (b)    A tribunal may not order a party to participate in a collaborative law process over that party’s objection.     (c)    A collaborative law process is concluded by:         (1)    A resolution of a collaborative matter as evidenced by a signed record;         (2)    A resolution of a […]

Section 3-2004 – Emergency Order

    During a collaborative law process, a tribunal may issue emergency orders to protect the health, safety, welfare, or interest of a person eligible for relief.

Section 3-2006 – Disclosure of Information

    (a)    Except as provided by law other than this subtitle, during the collaborative law process a party shall:         (1)    On the request of another party, make timely, full, candid, and informal disclosure of information related to the collaborative matter without formal discovery; and         (2)    Update promptly previously disclosed information that has materially changed.     (b)    Parties may define the scope […]

Section 3-2009 – Privilege Against Disclosure for Collaborative Law Communication; Admissibility; Discovery

    (a)    Subject to §§ 3–2011 and 3–2012 of this subtitle, a collaborative law communication is privileged under subsection (b) of this section, is not subject to discovery, and is not admissible in evidence.     (b)    In a proceeding, the following privileges apply:         (1)    A party may refuse to disclose and may prevent any other person from disclosing a collaborative […]

Section 3-2010 – Waiver and Preclusion of Privilege

    (a)    A privilege under § 3–2009 of this subtitle may be waived in a record or orally during a proceeding if it is expressly waived by each party and, in the case of the privilege of a nonparty participant, the privilege is also expressly waived by the nonparty participant.     (b)    A person that makes a disclosure or […]

Section 3-2011 – Limits of Privilege

    (a)    There is no privilege under § 3–2009 of this subtitle for a collaborative law communication that is:         (1)    Available to the public under Title 10, Subtitle 6 of the State Government Article or made during a session of a collaborative law process that is open or is required by law to be open to the public; […]

Section 3-2012 – Authority of Tribunal in Case of Noncompliance

    (a)    Notwithstanding the failure of an agreement to meet the requirements of § 3–2002 of this subtitle, a tribunal may find that the parties intended to enter into a collaborative law participation agreement if the parties:         (1)    Signed a record indicating an intention to enter into a collaborative law participation agreement; and         (2)    Reasonably believed they were participating […]