US Lawyer Database

For Lawyer-Seekers

YOU DESERVE THE BEST LAWYER

Rule 38. Right to a Jury Trial; Demand

Rule 38. Right to a Jury Trial; Demand. (a) Right Preserved. The right of trial by jury as declared by the Montana Constitution — or as provided by a Montana statute — is preserved to the parties inviolate. (b) Demand. On any issue triable of right by a jury, a party may demand a jury trial by: (1) serving the […]

Rule 39. Trial by Jury or by the Court

Rule 39. Trial by Jury or by the Court. (a) When a Demand is Made. When a jury trial has been demanded under Rule 38, the action must be designated on the docket as a jury action. The trial on all issues so demanded must be by jury unless: (1) the parties or their attorneys file a stipulation to […]

Rule 40. Scheduling Cases for Trial

Rule 40. Scheduling Cases for Trial. Each court must provide by rule for scheduling trials. The court must give priority to actions entitled to priority by a Montana statute. History: En. Sup. Ct. Ord. No. AF 07-0157, April 26, 2011, eff. Oct. 1, 2011.

Rule 41. Dismissal of Actions

Rule 41. Dismissal of Actions. (a) Voluntary Dismissal. (1) By the Plaintiff. (A) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any applicable state statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; […]

Rule 42. Consolidation; Separate Trials

Rule 42. Consolidation; Separate Trials. (a) Consolidation. If actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or trial any or all matters at issue in the actions; (2) consolidate the actions; or (3) issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay. (b) Separate Trials. For convenience, to avoid prejudice, […]

Rule 43. Taking Testimony

Rule 43. Taking Testimony. (a) In Open Court. At trial, the witnesses’ testimony must be taken in open court unless a Montana statute, the Montana Rules of Evidence, these rules, or other rules adopted by the supreme court provide otherwise. For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court […]

Rule 44. Proving an Official Record

Rule 44. Proving an Official Record. (a) Means of Proving. (1) Domestic Record. Each of the following evidences an official record — or an entry in it — that is otherwise admissible and is kept within the United States, any state, district, or commonwealth, or any territory subject to the administrative or judicial jurisdiction of the United States: (A) an […]

Rule 44.1. Determining Foreign Law

Rule 44.1. Determining Foreign Law. A party who intends to raise an issue about a foreign country’s law must give notice by a pleading or other writing. In determining foreign law, the court may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. […]

Rule 45. Subpoena

Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) In General. (1) Form and Contents. (A) Requirements — In General. Every subpoena must: (i) state the court from which it issued; (ii) state the title of the action, the court in which it is pending, and its cause number; (iii) command each person to whom it is directed to do the following at a specified time and place: […]

Rule 46. Objecting to a Ruling or Order

Rule 46. Objecting to a Ruling or Order. A formal exception to a ruling or order is unnecessary. When the ruling or order is requested or made, a party need only state the action that it wants the court to take or objects to, along with the grounds for the request or objection. Failing to object does […]

Rule 47. Jurors

Rule 47. Jurors. (a) Examination of Jurors. (1) The court shall permit the parties or their attorneys to conduct the examination of prospective jurors under its supervision. The court may supplement the examination by such further inquiry as it deems proper. (2) Challenges for cause must be tried by the court. The juror challenged and any other person may be […]

Rule 48. Juries — Verdict

Rule 48. Juries — Verdict. At least two-thirds in number of any jury may render a verdict or finding, and such verdict or finding so rendered shall have the same force and effect as if all such jury concurred therein. The parties may stipulate that the jury shall consist of less number than 12. History: En. Sup. Ct. […]

Rule 49. Special Verdicts and Interrogatories

Rule 49. Special Verdicts and Interrogatories. (a) Special Verdict. (1) In General. The court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding on each issue of fact. The court may do so by: (A) submitting written questions susceptible of a categorical or other brief answer; (B) submitting written forms of the […]

Rule 51. Instructions to the Jury; Objections; Preserving a Claim of Error

Rule 51. Instructions to the Jury; Objections; Preserving a Claim of Error. (a) Requests. (1) Before or at the Close of the Evidence. At the close of the evidence or at any earlier reasonable time that the court orders, a party may file and furnish to every other party written requests for the jury instructions it wants the court […]

Rule 52. Findings and Conclusions by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings

Rule 52. Findings and Conclusions by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings. (a) Findings and Conclusions. (1) In General. In an action tried on the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court must find the facts specially and state its conclusions of law separately. The findings and conclusions may be stated on the record after […]

Rule 53. Masters

Rule 53. Masters. (a) Appointment. (1) Definition. As used in these rules, the word “master” includes a referee, an auditor, an examiner, and an assessor. (A) Standing Masters. A judicial district may appoint one or more standing masters for its district with the concurrence of a majority of all the judges in the district. (B) Special Masters. A court in which […]