US Lawyer Database

25-40-117. Waiver and preclusion of privilege

25-40-117. Waiver and preclusion of privilege. (1) A privilege under 25-40-116 may be waived in a record or orally during a proceeding if it is expressly waived by all parties and, in the case of the privilege of a nonparty participant, it is also expressly waived by the nonparty participant. (2) A person that makes a disclosure […]

25-40-118. Limits of privilege

25-40-118. Limits of privilege. (1) There is no privilege under 25-40-116 for a collaborative law communication that is: (a) available to the public or made during a session of a collaborative law process that is open or is required by law to be open to the public; (b) a threat or statement of a plan to inflict bodily […]

25-40-119. Authority of tribunal in case of noncompliance

25-40-119. Authority of tribunal in case of noncompliance. (1) If an agreement fails to meet the requirements of 25-40-103 or a lawyer fails to comply with 25-40-114 or 25-40-115, a tribunal may still find that the parties intended to enter into a collaborative law participation agreement if they: (a) signed a record indicating an intention to enter […]

25-40-120. Uniformity of application and construction

25-40-120. Uniformity of application and construction. In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it. History: En. Sec. 20, Ch. 200, L. 2015.

25-40-121. Relation to Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act

25-40-121. Relation to Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. This part modifies, limits, and supersedes the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001, et seq., but does not modify, limit, or supersede section 101(c) of that act, 15 U.S.C. 7001(c), or authorize electronic delivery of any of the notices described […]

25-40-113. Appropriateness of collaborative law process

25-40-113. Appropriateness of collaborative law process. Before a prospective party signs a collaborative law participation agreement, a prospective collaborative lawyer shall: (1) assess with the prospective party factors the lawyer reasonably believes relate to whether a collaborative law process is appropriate for the prospective party’s matter; (2) provide the prospective party with information that the lawyer reasonably believes […]

25-40-114. Coercive or violent relationship

25-40-114. Coercive or violent relationship. (1) Before a prospective party signs a collaborative law participation agreement, a prospective collaborative lawyer shall make reasonable inquiry whether the prospective party has a history of a coercive or violent relationship with another prospective party. (2) Throughout a collaborative law process, a collaborative lawyer reasonably and continuously shall assess whether the […]

25-40-116. Privilege against disclosure for collaborative law communication — admissibility — discovery

25-40-116. Privilege against disclosure for collaborative law communication — admissibility — discovery. (1) Subject to 25-40-117 and 25-40-118, a collaborative law communication is privileged under subsection (2) of this section, is not subject to discovery, and is not admissible in evidence. (2) In a proceeding, the following privileges apply: (a) A party may refuse to disclose, and may […]