US Lawyer Database

§60-1004. Tract of land in more than one coordinate zone.

When any tract of land to be defined by a single description extends from one into the other of the above coordinate zones, the positions of all points on its boundaries may be referred to either of the two zones, the zone which is used being specifically named in the description. Added by Laws 1990, […]

§60-1005. Definitions.

A. For purposes of more precisely defining the Oklahoma Coordinate System of 1927, the following definition by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey (now National Ocean Service/National Geodetic Survey) is adopted: 1. The “Oklahoma Coordinate System of 1927 North Zone”, is a Lambert conformal conic projection of the Clarke spheroid of 1866, having parallels […]

§60-1006. Limitations on recording coordinates.

No coordinates based on either Oklahoma coordinate system, purporting to define the position of a point on a land boundary, shall be presented to be recorded in any public land records or deed records unless such point is within one (1) mile of a monumented horizontal control station established in conformity with the standards of […]

§60-1007. Conversion of feet to meters.

For the Oklahoma Coordinate System, the unit used to convert feet to meters shall be the United States survey foot 39.37/12 feet for each meter. Added by Laws 1990, c. 138, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 1990.

§60-1101. Unconstitutional.

NOTE: This section was held unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Weddington v. Henry, 202 P.3d 143, 2008 OK 102 (2009).

§60-1102. Unconstitutional.

NOTE: This section was held unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Weddington v. Henry, 202 P.3d 143, 2008 OK 102 (2009).

§60-1103. Unconstitutional.

NOTE: This section was held unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Weddington v. Henry, 202 P.3d 143, 2008 OK 102 (2009).

§60-1104. Unconstitutional.

NOTE: This section was held unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Weddington v. Henry, 202 P.3d 143, 2008 OK 102 (2009).