Section 16-22-11 – Promulgation of rules governing evidence-based felony probation supervision practices.
16-22-11. Promulgation of rules governing evidence-based felony probation supervision practices. The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 governing evidence-based felony probation supervision practices, including a validated risk and needs assessment, and targeting the probationer’s criminal risk factors with suitable supervision and intervention, focusing resources on moderate-risk and high-risk offenders. Source: SL 2013, ch […]
Section 16-22-12 – Report of probation practices and training implementation.
16-22-12. Report of probation practices and training implementation. The Unified Judicial System shall monitor and report semiannually to the oversight council the extent to which practices of probation supervision, as adopted in rule by the Supreme Court, as well as training requirements prescribed in §§16-22-15 and 16-14-4 are implemented. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §15, […]
Section 16-22-13 – Promulgation of rules regarding graduated sanctions program.
16-22-13. Promulgation of rules regarding graduated sanctions program. The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 to develop a graduated sanctions procedure and grid to guide court services officers in determining the appropriate response to a violation of conditions of probation. The graduated sanctions program shall use short jail stays as the most severe […]
Section 16-22-14 – Report of graduated sanctions.
16-22-14. Report of graduated sanctions. The State Court Administrator’s Office shall report semiannually to the oversight council the number and percentage of probationers who received a graduated sanction. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §17, eff. Oct. 1, 2013.
Section 16-22-15 – Evidence-based practices training.
16-22-15. Evidence-based practices training. Any person who exercises supervision over a probationer pursuant to §23A-27-12.1 or provides intervention services to any probationer shall receive sufficient training on evidence-based practices, how to target criminal risk factors to reduce recidivism, recognizing the signs and symptoms of mental health problems, and defusing mental health crises. Source: SL 2013, […]
Section 16-22-16 – Case history and risk and needs assessment of probationer.
16-22-16. Case history and risk and needs assessment of probationer. If a probationer is sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the state penitentiary, the Unified Judicial System shall transfer the case history of the probationer including the results of a risk and needs assessment conducted on the probationer to the Department of Corrections. Source: […]
Section 16-22-8 – HOPE probation programs.
16-22-8. HOPE probation programs. The Supreme Court is authorized to establish South Dakota HOPE probation programs in any court that has jurisdiction over criminal cases. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §9, eff. Jan. 1, 2014; SL 2016, ch 113, §1.
Section 16-22-8.1 – Assignment of magistrate judge to preside over HOPE probation program.
16-22-8.1. Assignment of magistrate judge to preside over HOPE probation program. Any magistrate court with a magistrate judge presiding may, upon assignment of the presiding judge of the circuit, act in lieu of a circuit court judge having jurisdiction to administer and preside over a HOPE probation program established under §16-22-8. Source: SL 2018, ch […]
Section 16-22-2 – Drug court advisory council.
16-22-2. Drug court advisory council. The Chief Justice shall establish an advisory council to address the operational, coordination, resource, information management, and evaluation needs of the drug courts. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §2.
Section 16-22-3 – Drug court defined.
16-22-3. Drug court defined. For the purposes of this chapter, a drug court is a court supervised alternative to incarceration and includes drug, driving under influence, and other specialty court dockets aimed at increasing offender accountability and decreasing recidivism. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §3.