This act [44-9-1 to 44-9-14 NMSA 1978] may be cited as the “Fraud Against Taxpayers Act”. History: Laws 2007, ch. 40, § 1. ANNOTATIONS Cross references. — For the New Mexico finance authority, see 6-21-4 NMSA 1978. For the mortgage finance authority, see 58-18-4 NMSA 1978. For the New Mexico lottery authority, see 6-24-5 NMSA […]
The state or political subdivision shall not be liable for expenses or fees that a qui tam plaintiff may incur in investigating or bringing an action pursuant to the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. History: Laws 2007, ch. 40, § 10; 2015, ch. 128, § 9. ANNOTATIONS The 2015 amendment, effective June 19, 2015, provided that […]
A. An employer shall not make, adopt or enforce a rule, regulation or policy preventing an employee from disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency or from acting in furtherance of a fraud against taxpayers action, including investigating, initiating, testifying or assisting in an action filed or to be filed pursuant to the […]
A. A civil action pursuant to the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act may be brought at any time. A civil action pursuant to the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act may be brought for conduct that occurred prior to the effective date of that act, but not for conduct that occurred prior to July 1, 1987. B. Notwithstanding […]
Liability shall be joint and several for any act committed by two or more persons in violation of the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act [44-9-1 NMSA 1978]. History: Laws 2007, ch. 40, § 13. ANNOTATIONS Effective dates. — Laws 2007, ch. 40, § 16 makes the act effective July 1, 2007. Severability. — Laws 2007, ch. […]
The remedies provided for in the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act [44-9-1 NMSA 1978] are not exclusive and shall be in addition to any other remedies provided for in any other law or available under common law. History: Laws 2007, ch. 40, § 14. ANNOTATIONS Effective dates. — Laws 2007, ch. 40, § 16 makes the […]
As used in the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act: A. “claim” means a request or demand for money, property or services when all or a portion of the money, property or services requested or demanded issues from or is provided or reimbursed by the state or a political subdivision; B. “employer” includes an individual, corporation, firm, […]
A. A person shall not: (1) knowingly present, or cause to be presented, to an employee, officer or agent of the state or a political subdivision or to a contractor, grantee or other recipient of state or political subdivision funds a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; (2) knowingly make or use, or […]
A. The attorney general shall diligently investigate suspected violations of Section 44-9-3 NMSA 1978, and if the attorney general finds that a person has violated or is violating that section, the attorney general may bring a civil action against that person pursuant to the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. B. The attorney general may in appropriate […]
A. A person may bring a civil action for a violation of Section 44-9-3 NMSA 1978 on behalf of the person and the state or political subdivision. The action shall be brought in the name of the state or political subdivision. The person bringing the action shall be referred to as the qui tam plaintiff. […]
A. If the state or political subdivision proceeds with the action, it shall have the primary responsibility of prosecuting the action and shall not be bound by an act of the qui tam plaintiff. The qui tam plaintiff shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations of […]
A. Except as otherwise provided in this section, if the state or a political subdivision proceeds with an action brought by a qui tam plaintiff and the state or political subdivision prevails in the action, the qui tam plaintiff shall receive: (1) at least fifteen percent but not more than twenty-five percent of the proceeds […]
If the state or political subdivision does not proceed with the action and the qui tam plaintiff conducts the action, the court may award a defendant reasonable attorney fees and costs if the defendant prevails and the court finds the action clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious or brought primarily for the purpose of harassment. History: Laws […]
A. No court shall have jurisdiction over an action brought pursuant to Section 44-9-5 NMSA 1978 by a present or former employee of the state or political subdivision unless the employee, during employment with the state or political subdivision and in good faith, exhausted existing internal procedures for reporting false claims and the state or […]