Sec. 1. The prosecuting attorney in a county in which the violation occurs may bring an action under this section to enjoin a violation of IC 35-45-6-2 (corrupt business influence). An action under this section may be brought in any circuit or superior court in a county in which the violation occurs. If the court […]
Sec. 2. (a) The prosecuting attorney in a county in which any of the property is located may bring an action for the forfeiture of any property: (1) used in the course of; (2) intended for use in the course of; (3) derived from; or (4) realized through; conduct in violation of IC 35-45-6-2. (b) […]
Sec. 3. When an action is filed under section 2 of this chapter, the prosecuting attorney or the inspector general may move for an order to have property subject to forfeiture seized by a law enforcement agency. The judge shall issue such an order upon a showing of probable cause to believe that: (1) a […]
Sec. 4. (a) Property subject to forfeiture under this chapter shall be seized by a law enforcement officer upon court order. Seizure may be made without a court order only if: (1) the seizure is incident to a lawful arrest or search, or to an inspection under an administrative inspection warrant; or (2) the property […]
Sec. 5. (a) If a person holding a valid lien, mortgage, security interest, or interest under a conditional sales contract did not know the property was the object of corrupt business influence or conduct described in section 2(b) of this chapter, the court shall determine whether the secured interest is equal to or in excess […]
Sec. 6. (a) An aggrieved person may, in addition to proceeding under section 4 of this chapter, bring an action for injunctive relief from corrupt business influence in a circuit or superior court in the county of the aggrieved person’s residence, or in a county where any of the affected property or the affected enterprise […]
Sec. 7. In any action brought under this chapter (or IC 34-4-30 before its repeal), the principle of collateral estoppel operates to bar relitigation of the issues previously determined in a criminal proceeding under IC 35-45-6-2. [Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-4-30.5-6.] As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.19.
Sec. 8. (a) A prosecuting attorney or the inspector general may retain an attorney to bring an action under this chapter. (b) An attorney retained under this section is not required to be a deputy prosecuting attorney but must be admitted to the practice of law in Indiana. [Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-4-30.5-7.] As added by […]