US Lawyer Database

For Lawyer-Seekers

YOU DESERVE THE BEST LAWYER

Home » US Law » 2022 Oklahoma Statutes » Title 13. Common Carriers

§13-153. Connecting carrier – Reweighing on transfer.

In case any coal shipped shall be carried over the lines of the connecting carriers, the carrier receiving said coal shall cause the correct weight thereof to be placed in the bill of lading, and such coal shall be reweighed when delivered to the connecting carrier, and the value of the coal at the point […]

§13-154. Consignee – Reweighing at destination – Liability of carrier.

In case the carrier shall fail or refuse to weigh said coal at its destination or at the nearest track scales to the point of destination between said point and the point of shipment, the consignee may weigh said coal, and his weights shall be prima facie evidence of the amount of coal received, and […]

§13-155. Failure to weigh – False weights – Penalties.

Any agent, servant or employee of any carrier who shall fail or refuse to weigh any coal at its point of destination, or shall knowingly or willfully make false weights of such coal, or in case there are no track scales at the point of destination, at the nearest track scales passed in its transit […]

§13-156. Weighing interstate shipments.

Whenever any coal shall be brought into this state by any carrier where the point of shipment is outside of the state, the same shall be weighed by the carrier at the nearest track scales within the state to the state line; and after being so weighed, as to its further carriage all of the […]

§13-157. Method of weighing – Stencil weights.

In case any contention shall arise between the consignee and the carrier in regard to the shortage of coal on any car, the car shall be weighed first while loaded and then the empty car shall be weighed again and the actual gross and net weights shall be ascertained, and the stencil weight of any […]

§13-16. Acceptance of ticket, etc., as assent to contract.

A passenger, consignor or consignee by accepting a ticket, bill of lading or written contract for carriage, with a knowledge of its terms, assents to the rate of hire, the time, place and manner of delivery therein stated. But his assent to any other modification of the carrier’s rights or obligations contained in such instrument […]

§13-176.1. Short title.

Sections 1 through 14 of this act shall be known and may be cited as the “Security of Communications Act”. Added by Laws 1982, c. 343, § 1.

§13-176.11. Reports.

A. Within thirty (30) days after the expiration of an order, or each extension thereof, entered under Section 176.7 of this title, or the denial of an order approving an interception, the judge of competent jurisdiction shall file a sealed, written report with the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals that includes the following […]

§13-176.13. Suppression of intercepted communication or evidence derived therefrom.

A. Any aggrieved person in any trial, hearing or proceeding in or before any court, department, officer, agency, regulatory body or other authority may move to suppress the contents of any intercepted wire, oral or electronic communication, or evidence derived therefrom, on the grounds that: 1. The communication was unlawfully intercepted; 2. The order of […]

§13-176.14. State’s right to appeal certain orders.

In addition to any other right to appeal, the state shall have the right to appeal from either an order granting a motion to suppress made under Section 13 of the Security of Communications Act or the denial of an application for an order of authorization if the Attorney General certifies to the judge or […]

§13-176.2. Definitions.

As used in the Security of Communications Act: 1. “Aggrieved person” means a person who was a party to any intercepted wire, oral or electronic communication or a person against whom the interception was directed; 2. “Aural acquisition” means obtaining knowledge of a communication through the sense of hearing which is contemporaneous with the communication; […]

§13-176.3. Prohibited acts – Felonies – Penalties – Venue.

Except as otherwise specifically provided in this act, any person is guilty of a felony and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), or by imprisonment of not more than five (5) years, or by both who: 1. Willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept or procures any […]

§13-176.4. Acts not prohibited.

It is not unlawful pursuant to the Security of Communications Act for: 1. an operator of a switchboard, or an officer, employee, or agent of any communication common carrier whose facilities are used in the transmission of a wire, oral or electronic communication to intercept, disclose, or use that communication in the normal course of […]

§13-176.5. Seizure and forfeiture of certain devices.

Any electronic, mechanical or other device used, sent, carried, manufactured, assembled, possessed or sold in violation of the Security of Communications Act may be seized and forfeited to the state. Added by Laws 1982, c. 343, § 5.

§13-176.6. Use of certain intercepted communications as evidence prohibited.

Whenever any wire, oral or electronic communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee or other authority of the state, […]

§13-176.7. Court order authorizing interception of communications.

The Attorney General, upon application by a district attorney, may make application to a judge of competent jurisdiction for, and such judge may grant in conformity with the Security of Communications Act, an order authorizing the interception of wire, oral or electronic communications by any law enforcement agency of this state or any political subdivision […]

§13-176.8. Disclosure of information.

A. Any law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by the Security of Communications Act, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication or evidence derived therefrom may disclose such contents to another law enforcement officer to the extent that such disclosure is appropriate to the proper performance of […]