US Lawyer Database

For Lawyer-Seekers

YOU DESERVE THE BEST LAWYER

Section 20-11-2 – Classes of defamation.

20-11-2. Classes of defamation. Defamation is effected by: (1)Libel; or (2)Slander. Source: CivC 1877, §28; CL 1887, §2527; RCivC 1903, §28; RC 1919, §94; SDC 1939, §47.0502.

Section 20-11-3 – Libel defined.

20-11-3. Libel defined. Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation. Source: CivC 1877, […]

Section 20-11-4 – Slander defined.

20-11-4. Slander defined. Slander is a false and unprivileged publication, other than libel, which: (1)Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime; (2)Imputes to him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease; (3)Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade, or […]

Section 20-11-5 – Privileged communications–Malice not inferred from publication.

20-11-5. Privileged communications–Malice not inferred from publication. A privileged communication is one made: (1)In the proper discharge of an official duty; (2)In any legislative or judicial proceeding, or in any other official proceeding authorized by law; (3)In a communication, without malice, to a person interested therein, by one who is also interested, or by one […]

Section 20-11-6 – Radio and television stations not liable if due care exercised.

20-11-6. Radio and television stations not liable if due care exercised. The owner, licensee, or operator of a visual or sound radio broadcasting station or network of stations, and the agents or employees of any such owner, licensee, or operator, shall not be liable for any damages for any defamatory statement published or uttered in […]

Section 20-11-8 – Newspaper retraction as rebuttal of presumption of malice.

20-11-8. Newspaper retraction as rebuttal of presumption of malice. The publication of a full and fair retraction of the alleged defamatory statement as provided by §20-11-7 shall, on the trial of an action for such libel, be held and considered a rebuttal of any and all presumption of malice attached to and growing out of […]